<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Oxford English Dictionary Webster.com &#8211; Harry Jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://127.0.0.1:8090/tag/oxford-english-dictionary-webster-com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://127.0.0.1:8090</link>
	<description>Parent, Painter, Programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 10:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Oxford Dictionary</title>
		<link>http://127.0.0.1:8090/oxford_dictionary.htm</link>
					<comments>http://127.0.0.1:8090/oxford_dictionary.htm#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 10:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford English Dictionary Webster.com]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hjackson.org/wp/?p=265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I noticed tonight that the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) is being replaced by www.webster.com. How do I know this? Well, have a look for ClAMOUR what on earth do they mean chiefly British variant of CLAMOR BOLLIX. What they should really mean is CLAMOUR proper spelling of our americanised terrible spelling of CLAMOR All jokes &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="http://127.0.0.1:8090/oxford_dictionary.htm" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Oxford Dictionary"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed tonight that the <b>Oxford English Dictionary (OED)</b> is being replaced by <a href="http://www.webster.com/">www.webster.com</a>.<br />
How do I know this? Well, have a look for<br />
<a href="http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&amp;va=clamour">ClAMOUR</a><br />
what on earth do they mean <b><i>chiefly British variant of CLAMOR</i></b><br />
BOLLIX.  What they should really mean is<br />
CLAMOUR<br />
proper spelling of our americani<b>s</b>ed terrible spelling of <b>CLAMOR</b><br />
All jokes aside I use webster.com almost religiously and have even adopted color over colour. Having looked at the OED website it&#8217;s little wonder why people are now using the webster.com dictionary over the OED. The OED has pushed a small search box over to the right hand side corner and filled the screen with:<br />
1: A word of the day<br />
If I wanted a word of the day I would go looking for it. Its a bit daft to place this &#8220;nice feature&#8221; above the dictionary.<br />
2: A quote From.<br />
I own the &#8220;Oxford Dictionary of Quotations&#8221; and if I am after a quote I am not looking for a Dictionary.<br />
3, A word From (some foreign language).<br />
Who cares how the French say &#8220;shit&#8221;, wheres the <b>ENGLISH</b> dictionary &#8230;..(I o)<br />
I think the OED is selling itself short. I know that for some people Webster is the be all and end all but I am still a believer in the OED. I would like the OED to retain the definitive English dictionary crown but judging from their website this looks unlikely. They should really place more emphasis on it than they do or they risk becoming runner up to webster.com or some other more techno savvy company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://127.0.0.1:8090/oxford_dictionary.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
