<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>W3C Schema &#8211; Harry Jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://127.0.0.1:8090/tag/w3c-schema/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://127.0.0.1:8090</link>
	<description>Parent, Painter, Programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Atom Schema or DTD</title>
		<link>http://127.0.0.1:8090/atom-schema-or-dtd.htm</link>
					<comments>http://127.0.0.1:8090/atom-schema-or-dtd.htm#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[harry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relax NG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W3C Schema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XML]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hjackson.org/wp/?p=372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is none. Stop looking! Neither W3C Schema&#8217;s or Relax NG are capable of describing the the Atom specification so if you want a compliant validator you&#8217;ll need to write your own. For a thread on the issue see: No W3C Schema for Atom I also ran into an interesting thread where James Clark puts &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="http://127.0.0.1:8090/atom-schema-or-dtd.htm" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Atom Schema or DTD"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is none. Stop looking! </p>
<p>Neither W3C Schema&#8217;s or Relax NG are capable of describing the the Atom specification so if you want a compliant validator you&#8217;ll need to write your own.</p>
<p>For a thread on the issue see:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/abdera-user@incubator.apache.org/msg00718.html">No W3C Schema for Atom</a></p>
<p>I also ran into an interesting thread where James Clark puts forward Relax NG as a serious alternative to W3C Schema. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-use/mail-archive/msg00217.html">Relax NG vs W3C Schema</a></p>
<p>Having dealt with both I can say I prefer Relax NG. Its simpler.</p>
<p> </p>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://127.0.0.1:8090/atom-schema-or-dtd.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
